Legal Opinion

Town of Winton v. Scott

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1986No. 856SC1155PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

First we note that this is an appeal from an interlocutory order and as such is subject to dismissal. Nevertheless, we treat this matter as a petition for a writ of certiorari, and in our discretion allow the same.

Scott and Eley Appeal

These appellants contend the court erred by awarding Matilda Vann or her successors any interest in the sixty-acre tract of land. We disagree.

The Scotts first contend that they obtained title to this property by ouster of a co-tenant. In Collier v. Welker, 19 N.C. App. 617, 620-621, 199 S.E. 2d 691, 694-95 (1973), Judge (later Justice) Vaughn wrote…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Dobbins v. Dobbins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Page v. . BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atl. Coast Props., Inc. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. BeltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Kirkman v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Atl. Coast Props., Inc. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API