Legal Opinion

Beck v. Beck

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1997No. COA96-115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether respondent, a tenant in common with petitioner, has ownership of the subject property by reason of the application of the doctrine of adverse possession. Petitioner petitioned the trial court for partition of the subject property pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 46-3 (1984). Respondent answered the petition and claimed ownership of the land by adverse possession. We hold that respondent actually ousted petitioner in 1973, has held the property adversely to petitioner for more than twenty years, and is therefore entitled to undivided…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Dobbins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Thomas v. . GarvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atl. Coast Props., Inc. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Atl. Coast Props., Inc. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Harris v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API