Kelly v. Municipal Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Question: Does the respondent court have jurisdiction to proceed with the trial of petitioner upon a complaint that charges a violation of section 290 of the Penal Code (failure to report a change of address) despite the fact that prior to this alleged failure the conviction (violation of Pen. Code, § 288a) upon which the section 290 charge is based was set aside and petitioner “released from all penalties and disabilities” pursuant to the provisions of section 1203.4 of the Penal Code? *
In such a state of facts does such a complaint charge the violation of a public offense…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Meyer v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wright v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Barrows v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.