Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1958No. Civ. 18048PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Question: Does the respondent court have jurisdiction to proceed with the trial of petitioner upon a complaint that charges a violation of section 290 of the Penal Code (failure to report a change of address) despite the fact that prior to this alleged failure the conviction (violation of Pen. Code, § 288a) upon which the section 290 charge is based was set aside and petitioner “released from all penalties and disabilities” pursuant to the provisions of section 1203.4 of the Penal Code? *

In such a state of facts does such a complaint charge the violation of a public offense…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In Re PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Meyer v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Wright v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Barrows v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API