Legal Opinion
In Re Reed
California Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1983No. Crim. 22595PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Petitioner was convicted of soliciting “lewd or dissolute conduct” from an undercover vice officer in a public restroom, in violation of Penal Code section 647, subdivision (a).1 The court sentenced him to three years formal probation on the condition that he obey all laws and observe the rules established by his probation officer. Pursuant to section 290 petitioner was ordered to register with the Los Angeles Police Department as a sex offender.
*918Petitioner does not challenge either the constitutionality of section 647(a) or the validity of his own conviction; nor does he argue…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Jesus Nino v. George Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.