S. Martinelli & Co. v. WASH. STATE DEPT. OF REV.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Houghton, A,C. J.
S. Martinelli and Company (Martinelli) and the Washington Department of Revenue (DOR) appeal from the trial court’s grant of a partial summary judgment to each party on different provisions of the State excise tax statute. The trial court determined that Martinelli’s sparkling, 100 percent fruit juices were "carbonated beverages” subject to the carbonated beverage tax, RCW 82.64. The trial court also determined that the same juices were not "carbonated beverages” under RCW 82.12, the use tax. We conclude that Martinelli’s sparkling juices are "carbonated beverages” and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Commodore v. University Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Bellevue v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 1604Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Impecoven v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SunichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dash Point Village Associates v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Medical Consultants Northwest, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Bravern Residential II, LLC v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Safeway, Inc. v. Deparment of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Safeway, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.