Legal Opinion

Dash Point Village Associates v. Exxon Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 9, 1997No. 36382-4-IPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

After gasoline from an Exxon station contaminated the groundwater below a neighboring shopping center owned by Dash Point, 1 a jury found Exxon liable under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) and awarded Dash Point its costs and expenditures for remediation of the shopping center property. On appeal, Exxon does not dispute its liability for the cleanup of the Dash Point property. Rather it claims that the trial court erred (1) by failing to make a determination of whether Dash Point’s remedial actions were substantially equivalent to a state-supervised cleanup operation, (2) by apportioning…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Nordstrom, Inc. v. TampourlosWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hume v. American Disposal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mayer v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Mayer v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API