Ruff v. County of Kings
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES (Doc. 211) AND AWARDING COSTS
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs motion for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Plaintiffs bill of costs, and Defendants County of Kings and Mark Sherman’s opposing bill of costs.
A. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES.
Plaintiff Daniel Ruff moves for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 in the amount of $217,365.00.
1. Governing Standards.
42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) provides:
In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Stormans Inc. v. SeleckyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Chasrick Heredia v. Michael Roscoe et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024
- (PC) Penton v. HubardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Manteca Lifestyle Center, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.