People v. Freshour
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the County Court of Tulare. Cross, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
The convict Randall, who was a witness called by the prosecution, having testified very fully as to his own connection with the actual commission of the alleged crime—that he was present at and a party to the larceny charged against the defendant—was asked by counsel for defendant: “ State the general plan which you and the defendant entered into with reference to stealing these cattle ? ” To which the witness said : “ I decline to answer.” The Court: “ What is your reason for declining ? ” Answer: “ On the ground that it would criminate me in other circumstances.” By the Court:…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Town of Norfolk v. GaylordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. St. PierreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Ex parte SeniorSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Scribner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.