Erickson v. Drazkowski
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gogebic. (Haire, J.) ' Trespass to personal property. Defendant Drazkowski brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This action is brought to recover the value of certain household goods, exempt from execution, taken .upon a writ of attachment.
Plaintiff and her husband resided at Ironwood. On the 11th of August, 1891, John Drazkowski, plaintiff in the attachment suit, together with one Eddy, a constable, went to plaintiff’s residence, and seized all of the household effects therein, consisting of furniture, beds, bedding, tableware, and kitchen utensils, the aggregate value of which was given at $100. Plaintiff and her husband had no friends in Ironwood, and few acquaintances. The result was that they were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tubbs v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Ritter v. DanielsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Omaha Auction & Storage Co. v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. GrundyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Shikany v. Salt Creek Transp. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Jeffries v. SnyderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Mason v. PartrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Matoole v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.