Legal Opinion

State v. Myers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1983No. 8222SC909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

Defendant Myers’ Appeal

Defendant’s sole issue presented for our review is whether the court erred by failing to submit to the jury the requested charge on the lesser-included offenses of trafficking in 1,000 and 5,000 dosage units of methaqualone.

Defendant argues that since only 20 of the 30,241 tablets were actually determined by chemical analysis to be metha-qualone, the court erred in denying defendant’s request for jury instructions on the lesser-included offense of trafficking in less than 10,000 dosage units of methaqualone. The trial court instructed the jury that in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. PoolosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. SummittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. ColsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API