Legal Opinion

State v. Summitt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1981No. 41PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the action of the trial judge in submitting to the jury, over his objection, the lesser-included offense of second-degree rape. Defendant argues that it was error to submit the lesser-included offense of second-degree rape because there was no evidence from which the jury could find that he committed that offense. Defendant was charged under the provisions of former G.S. 14-21, repealed effective 1 January 1980 which provided:

Every person who ravishes and carnally knows any female of the age. of 12 years or more by force and against her will,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. BoykinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. RushingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. DowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API