Legal Opinion

Deacon v. Deacon

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1929No. Docket No. 3653PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This is an action for an accounting and partition of certain property described in the plaintiff’s complaint. The record shows that on and prior to the fourteenth day of July, 1923, the plaintiff Clara E. Deacon and the defendant Daniel A. Deacon were husband and wife; that on said date an agreement settling and adjusting their property rights was executed and aelmowledged. This agreement recited that the parties had separated on the thirteenth day of March, 1923, were living apart, and that an action for divorce had been instituted; and for the purposes of settling and adjusting the property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Deacon v. DeaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Anger v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Buller v. BullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. General Electric Co. v. Central Surety & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API