Legal Opinion
Holt v. Holt
California Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1901No. L.A. No. 943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This is an action in partition in which the complaint alleges that the plaintiff Holt and the defendant Frances M. Holt are tenants in common, each having an estate of inheritance to the extent of one undivided half of the whole of the fee in a certain described lot in the city of Los Angeles; and that defendant Frances Bacon has a mortgage lien on the said interest of Frances M. Holt to the extent of five hundred dollars, besides interest.
The action was commenced January 6, 1899, a general demurrer to the complaint was overruled, an answer filed and a trial had, followed by an…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Abbott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Wernse v. DorseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Riley v. TurpinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Raisin Investment Co. v. MagginettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Cathcart v. Redlands Security Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.