Legal Opinion

Wernse v. Dorsey

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1935No. Sac. 4859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Plaintiff and respondent Harry W. Wernse and defendant and appellant Theodore C. Dorsey were owners of equal interests in certain mining ground in Nevada County known as the West Point Quartz Mining Claim. The interest of respondent was encumbered by deed of trust to secure an indebtedness of $10,000 in "favor of a predecessor in ownership of said interest. Respondent filed this action in partition alleging the necessity of sale of the property in lieu of a partition in kind, making no reference in his complaint to said deed of trust. Appellant answered admitting the title and interest as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deacon v. DeaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Holt v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Balkins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Parmelee v. BrainardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Balkins v. NorrbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Cathcart v. Redlands Security Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Lee v. National Collection Agency, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API