Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided March 26, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Treasurer Robert A. Butkin,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:

1. How should the State of Oklahoma distribute forestry payments to eligible counties pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 500 and the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000?

2. If the counties in Oklahoma that are eligible for these funds opt for the "full payment amount" under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, is each county's share based on the United States forest acreage in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McNeill v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Forston v. HeislerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Trinity Independent School District v. Walker CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. R. V. McGinnis Theatres & Pay T. V., Inc. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Georgia Pacific Corporation v. County of MendocinoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API