Legal Opinion
Georgia Pacific Corporation v. County of Mendocino
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 12, 1973No. C-71 366, C-71 1722 and C-71 1723PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WOLLENBERG, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The three cases in which this decision is rendered have been related and consolidated for purpose of trial on the merits. The questions of law and fact are identical, except insofar as No. C-71 — 366 challenges the valuation method used by the County of Mendocino in assessing a tax for the year 1970-71 against plaintiff Georgia Pacific Corporation (hereafter “Georgia”). A trial to the Court took place on November 13, 1972. All factual issues have been stipulated, except for questions of valuation. For a brief statement of the facts in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- International Paper Co. v. County of SiskiyouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Region 8 Forest Service Timber Purchasers Council v. AlcockDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1990
- International Paper Company v. County of Siskiyou, Diamond International Corporation v. County of Tehama, Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. The County of MendocinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2000
- Opinion No. (2003), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.