Legal Opinion
United States v. Albert J. Kinsey, United States of America v. Joseph Kinsey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1993No. 92-10013, 92-10014PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
The Kinseys were sentenced in 1987. Errors were made, both for and against their interests, in the structure of the sentences. In 1991, the Kinseys sought to correct the illegalities in their sentences which were against their interests, so the government sought to correct the illegalities which favored the Kinseys. The court corrected all the errors, leaving the Kinseys in the same position, with regard to duration of imprisonment, as they were before the illegalities were corrected, and as they would have been had they been sentenced correctly in the first place.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Robert Breest v. Raymond Helgemoe, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Agustin Gallegos-CurielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Joseph Samuel Kinsey, United States of America v. Albert KinseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Vincent CaterinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jose Leonardo Contreras-SubiasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. LightbourneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. AespuroDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1996
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 394, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 627 United States of America v. Valerie Lightbourne, United States of America v. Jon Lightbourne, United States of America v. Richard LightbourneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.