Legal Opinion
United States v. Lightbourne
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1997No. Nos. 96-30002, 96-30003, 96-30012PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated cases Jon Lightb-ourne (Jon), Richard Lightboume (Richard) and Valerie Lightboume (Valerie) appeal their convictions of conspiracy to manufacture and distribute N, N-dimethylampheta-mine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. All three defendants challenge the sufficiency of the search warrant underlying the discovery of their conspiracy. Richard and Valerie, who are husband and wife, argue that while they chose to have a single lawyer represent them at trial, .their interests were in conflict and they should have had different…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Brent Paul SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- United States v. Crespo de LlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Michael Anthony Lockhart v. C.A. Terhune, Director, California Department of Corrections Gail Lewis, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Parris W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- People v. EirishColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 394, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 627 United States of America v. Valerie Lightbourne, United States of America v. Jon Lightbourne, United States of America v. Richard LightbourneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.