Legal Opinion

United States v. Aespuro

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 5, 1996No. Civ. Nos. S-96-0373 WBS/JFM, S-96-0013 WBS/JFM. No. Cr. S-89-0476 WBSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHUBB, Chief Judge.

Defendants move to bar the court from resentencing them on the valid counts of their convictions after the court vacated the invalid counts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. After hearing, the court concludes it must resentence on the valid counts to correct the sentence.

I

BACKGROUND

Defendants dealt heroin from a house approximately 100 yards from an elementary school. When the police raided the place, they found inside heroin, over $120,000 in cash, an assault weapon and a revolver.

Subsequently, in 1990, a jury convicted defendants on three counts: (1)…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. Alion Andersson, United States of America v. Charles W. HinckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Agustin Gallegos-CurielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gordils v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. United States v. PecinaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
  3. Nohara v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API