Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Samuel Kinsey, United States of America v. Albert Kinsey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1988No. 87-1182, 87-1183PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEVRIZIAN, District Judge:
The District Court found appellants Joseph Samuel Kinsey and Albert Kinsey guilty of both conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Joseph and Albert Kinsey now raise numerous arguments on appeal. First, Joseph Kinsey contends that the District Court improperly admitted the expert opinion testimony of a narcotics officer regarding his, Joseph Kinsey’s, involvement in the distribution of the cocaine. Second, Albert Kinsey contends that the warrantless arrest of Joseph Kinsey was not justified by exigent circumstances. Third, Joseph and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. Kayle NordbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gloria Ann MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.