Legal Opinion

Bell v. Massey & Poultney

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1859PublishedCited by 9 opinions

from the Sixth District Court of New Orleans, Howell, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Land, J".

The question presented for our decision in this case, is the liability of the plaintiff on a judgment recovered by the defendants against him and others, on a promissory note, as follows :

$439 05. New Orleans, March 26th, 1856.

Twelve months after date, we promise to pay to the order of Hawes & Bell four hundred and thirty-nine dollars and five cents, value received.

(Signed) Medley & Oo.

(Endorsed) Peter Hawes,

W. R. Bell,

C. E. Christensen.

The judgment in question is in these words : “ That the plaintiffs, Massey & Poultney, recover from the defendants, W. R. Bell, C. E. Christensen and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prall v. Peet's CuratorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  2. Chapman v. EarlySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. SoutherlinTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. State Mortgage Corporation v. TraylorTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fowler v. DoyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Blythe v. GibbonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Glen Falls Indemnity Co. v. ManningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API