Legal Opinion
Blythe v. Gibbons
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1893No. 15,224PublishedCited by 16 opinions
From the Miami Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
On the 27th day of November, 1883, the firm of Benjamin F. Dow & Co., doing business at Peru, Ind., in the manufacture of threshing machines and engines, became financially embarrassed.
Their principal creditors, at the time, were the First National Bank and the Citizens’ National Bank, of Peru.
On the date named, said banks, by their attorneys, commenced suit upon the matured obligations of said firm in their favor, and asked the appointment of a receiver to take charge of the assets and business of said firm.
A receiver, the appellant James G. Blythe, was appointed in accordance with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Woodruff v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AdamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Hopper v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Fleenor v. DriskillIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Michigan Mutual Insurance Co. v. CombsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Kann v. BrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Buddenberg v. WelchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- Landowners Co. v. PendrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.