Legal Opinion

Glen Falls Indemnity Co. v. Manning

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1936No. 16403PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Judge.

As holder of a past-due promissory note executed by the defendants, Paul E. Manning, Emile de Smet Silva, and Mrs. Arthemise Manning, wife of Emile de Smet Silva, Glen Falls Indemnity Company filed this suit on January 11, 1934, praying for judgment against them. Serv-ite of process was regularly made upon all defendants and on April 2, 1934, a preliminary default judgment was entered in the district court. Thereafter, on April 24, 1934; the defendants having failed. to answer the plaintiff’s demand, judgment was rendered in confirmation of the preliminary default. This…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Factors & Traders' Insurance v. New Harbor Protection Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  3. Peniston v. SomersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  4. State ex rel. Vignes v. Judge of Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  5. Bell v. Massey & PoultneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Villaume v. VillaumeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Frisard v. AutinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Scott v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Houston Oil Field Material Co. v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Gotte v. Magnum Elec. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API