Application of Abner B. Stryker, Jr
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, which affirmed the rejection of both claims in appellant’s application serial No. 272,449, filed April 11, 1963, for an improved process for producing polypropylene. We reverse.
The invention is defined, and also adequately described for our purposes, by claim 1:
The process of removing propylene diluent from a suspension consisting essentially of from about 50%-60% by weight polypropylene in liquid propylene obtained directly from a propylene polymerization reactor under the autogenous pressure of the reactor…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of Guido H. Stempel, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In Re Harry TanczynCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- In Re Charles D. Huston and Darryl J. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In re DardickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- In re SpillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. SICOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.