Legal Opinion

Dollarhide v. Gunstream

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1951No. 5416PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

Appellant instituted suit for damages for the wrongful death of her husband resulting in an automobile collision. The jury found the issues in favor of appellee. From an order denying her motion to vacate the judgment and grant a new trial, she appeals. Neither negligence nor contributory negligence is an issue.

The alleged errors are: (a) that the instructions were sent to the jury room without the request of either party to the case; (b) unauthorized communications between court and jury; • and (c) improper cross-examination of appellant.

We briefly summarize the proceedings.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Brockway v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cerrillos Coal Railroad v. DeserantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1897
  4. English v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Cunningham v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Shepard v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. De La O v. Bimbo's Restaurant, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Budagher v. Amrep Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Haynes v. HockenhullNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API