Legal Opinion

State v. Donald

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1936No. 5767PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Justice.

Defendant was charged by the information of the district attorney of the crime of forgery in two counts, first, by forging the name of Clyde Kime to an American Express Company traveler's check, and, second, with the uttering as true and genuine the same check with intent to defraud W. B. Olson knowing the same to be forged and false. The jury acquitted defendant on the first count but convicted him on the second. Defendant appeals, and bases his claim for reversal on two assignments of error: (1) Insufficiency of the evidence to warrant the conviction; and (2) refusal of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Corpus Christi St. & Interurban Ry. Co. v. KjellbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. State v. RileyUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Long v. PayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. S. Lightburne & Co. v. First National Bank of RockportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Ryan v. Beaver CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wernsing v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. United States v. Charles Douglas Steele, AKA Miles ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. State v. SouzaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  4. Hillier v. LambornCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  5. State v. VivianoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API