Lindeberg v. Hodgens
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, entered on a verdict for defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtPendleton, J.
The action is for a balance alleged to be due plaintiffs as architects for services in preparing plans and superintendence of certain alterations in a dwelling house for defendant for an agreed *455price of ten per cent, of the cost and disbursements. The answer alleged negligence on plaintiffs’ part in superintendence by reason whereof inferior work and materials were allowed to be used, but did not allege any specific amount as or for damages.
At the trial plaintiffs proved the agreements, the cost of the work, their disbursements, the completion of the alterations, the issuing of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Turner v. . KouwenhovenNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Crouch v. . GutmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Richard Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Chatfield v. . SimonsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Dickinson v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Durham v. REIDSVILLE ENGINEERING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Palmer v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Lindeberg v. HodgensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Palmer v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954