Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1954No. Civ. No. 20263Published

1Opinion of the Court

127 Cal.App.2d 44 (1954)

DAN SAXON PALMER et al., Respondents,

v.

MAX BROWN, Appellant.

Civ. No. 20263.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Aug. 4, 1954.

Adelman, Schwartz & Ferguson and Isaac E. Ferguson for Appellant.

A. A. Rotberg for Respondents.

FOX, J.

In this action to recover for architectural services, with a cross- complaint raising issues of fraud, negligence and illegality of contract, defendant appeals from an adverse judgment.

Plaintiffs, Dan Saxon Palmer and William Krisel, copartners, brought this action to recover $2,190.01 as the balance claimed to be due for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Alexander v. HammarbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Payne v. De VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Joseph v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Shipman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API