City of Durham v. REIDSVILLE ENGINEERING COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
The additional defendants are relying upon two exceptions and the assignments of error based thereon as follows: (1) That the Judge of the Superior Court erred in overruling their demurrer in that the cross-action of the Casualty Company does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and (2) that the Judge of the Superior Court erred in overruling the demurrer to the amended cross-action of the Casualty Company in that there is a misjoinder of parties and causes of action.
With respect to the first assignment of error, it was stipulated that the pertinent portions of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bost v. . MetcalfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Schnepp v. . RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Williamson v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. County of New HanoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Shoffner Industries, Inc. v. W. B. Lloyd Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Bolton Corp. v. T. A. Loving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- RPR & ASSOCIATES v. O'Brien/Atkins AssociatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.