Legal Opinion

BNE Vehicle Leasing, Inc. v. Rothman

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 3, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.

This is an action under a Vehicle Lease Agreement by which plaintiff BNE Vehicle Leasing, Inc. (“BNE”) leased a 1989 Mazda to defendant David Roth-man (“Rothman”) for a four year term. BNE seeks to recover a balance allegedly due under the lease after Rothman’s default and BNE’s repossession and sale of the Mazda.

By answer and counterclaim, Rothman raised the only defense argued by the parties on this appeal; namely, that the parties’ lease was a “retail installment contract” governed by G.L.c. 255B, that BNE failed to give the notice of the rights of a defaulting buyer required by G.L.C.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wood v. Roy Lapidus, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Cruz Management Co. v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Tri-City Concrete Co. Inc. v. ALA Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Urban Investment & Development Co. v. Turner Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Anthony v. AnthonyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Samia v. D'AnnunzioMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
  2. Piscatelli v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
  3. Liquori v. PelleyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API