Legal Opinion

Cruz Management Co. v. Thomas

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 12, 1994PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The plaintiff, Cruz Management Co., Inc., commenced a summary process action for possession under G. L. c. 239 (1992 ed.) in the Housing Court for the city of Boston against its tenant, the defendant Bernice Thomas. Thomas filed an answer and counterclaims alleging breach of the implied warranty of habitability; breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, see G. L. c. 186, § 14 (1992 ed.); and a violation of G. L. c. 93A (1992 ed.).2 After a trial, the judge *784entered a written decision concluding that a breach of the implied warranty of habitability had been proved, and, on this ground,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Yorke Management v. CastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Maillet v. ATF-Davidson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Haddad v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bolden v. O'Connor Café of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Scott v. GarfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. McAllister v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Jablonski v. CaseyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. Adjartey v. Cent. Div. of the Hous. Court DepartmentandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API