Legal Opinion

Piscatelli v. Fitzgerald

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 3, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The defendant, Thomas J. Fitzgerald (“Fitzgerald”), has appealed the trial court’s judgment against Fitzgerald on the plaintiffs’ G.L.c. 93A claim and its assessment of double damages and attorney’s fees in the total amount of $53,463.99. Fitzgerald asserts on appeal that no demand letter was entered into evidence and, therefore, that the trial judge erred in finding a violation of G.L.c. 93A.2

The dispute between Fitzgerald and the plaintiffs, Laura and Lawrence Piscatelli *56(“Piscatellis”), arose from the construction of their home. The Piscatellis hired Fitzgerald to raze their existing home…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cassano v. GogosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Spilios v. CohenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  3. Frank Arena v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
  4. Revere Housing Authority v. ChouchosMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
  5. Wine v. Tak Hing WuMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leck v. Pope's Landing Marine, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API