Legal Opinion

Williams v. Fundingsland

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 5, 1923No. 10,505PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The parties made a written contract whereby plaintiff Fundingsland agreed to sell, and defendant Williams agreed to buy, certain lands in the state of Kansas; the seller therein covenanting to furnish an abstract of title showing “the title to be good and marketable.” The buyer paid $2,000 of the purchase price when the contract was signed, but refused to pay the remainder when due, on the ground that the abstract furnished showed the title to be substantially defective. This action is by the seller against the purchaser to recover the unpaid balance of the purchase price, and the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schettler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Van Brunt v. . Van BruntNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Meeker v. . DraffenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Bacon v. NicholsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. Miller v. WestonColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heinneman v. Colorado CollegeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. Watters v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Scullin v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Brunton v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  5. Hill v. AldrichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API