Hill v. Aldrich
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The primary purpose of this petition by the trustees under the will of Clara B. Kimball is to receive instructions whether Hilda Kimball, the widow of David Kimball (a son of the testatrix), is entitled to the payment of an annuity under the eighteenth clause of the will. From a decree of the Probate Court instructing that no annuity is payable to her, Hilda appeals. Hilda was the second wife of David, who, at the time of the execution of the will, was married to Astrid Kimball, who died shortly after the death of the testatrix. The instructions given by the Probate Court are tantamount to a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fitts v. PowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Proctor v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Tyler v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Van Brunt v. . Van BruntNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Beers v. NarramoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Dana v. GringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Wheeler v. KennardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Gordon v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Erny TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.