Legal Opinion

Rainwater-Boogher Hat Co. v. O'Neal & Evans

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1891No. 3200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate. Justice.

This is a suit for debt, brought by the appellant. The plaintiff sued out an attachment, which was quashed.

The only question presented by the appeal is upon the judgment quashing the attachment. The affidavit for attachment stated the amount of the plaintiff’s debt as follows: “Eleven hundred and sixty-one dollars, due in the following manner: $730.50 due by note with 10 per cent interest thereon from November 1, 1889; also the further sum of $380.75 due by open account February 1,1890, with interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent per annum from due.”

It appears…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donnelly v. ElserTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Washington Life Insurance v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Hereford Cattle Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Hereford Cattle Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Mansfield Savings Bank v. PostOhio Circuit Courts · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API