Legal Opinion

Hereford Cattle Co. v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1896Published

Error from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Burke.

1Opinion of the Court

LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.

— This suit was brought by defendant in error E. M. Powell upon a rent contract, for the sum of $4021.28, for certain pasture lands, and a writ of attachment .was sued out and levied upon the property of plaintiff in error for that amount. Upon the trial there was a recovery by plaintiff below, from which this writ of error is prosecuted.

The following statement of the facts in the brief of defendant in error is adopted: On June 12, 1886, the plaintiff rented to the defendant company the ranch, Almyra, for an annual rental of $2400 in money and $800 of the stock of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hochstadler Bros. v. SamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Brown v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Rogers v. East Line Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Waples-Platter Grocer Co. v. Basham Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Rainwater-Boogher Hat Co. v. O'Neal & EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API