Legal Opinion

Hereford Cattle Co. v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Burke.

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was brought by defendant in error E.M. Powell upon a rent contract, for the sum of $4021.28, for certain pasture lands, and a writ of attachment was sued out and levied upon the property of plaintiff in error for that amount. Upon the trial there was a recovery by plaintiff below, from which this writ of error is prosecuted.

The following statement of the facts in the brief of defendant in error is adopted: On June 12, 1886, the plaintiff rented to the defendant company the ranch, Almyra, for an annual rental of $2400 in money and $800 of the stock of the company, to be paid by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Milliken v. SmootTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hochstadler Bros. v. SamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. I. & G. N. R'y Co. v. LeakTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Brown v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. King v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1856

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fenter v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Jefferson Cotton Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. CongletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Kohn v. ZaludekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Davis v. AydelottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Faircloth v. FlewellenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API