People v. Juan C.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
This appeal addresses the constitutionality of a curfew regulation aimed at controlling civil unrest. We conclude that the curfew regulation passes constitutional muster in that it is neither overly broad nor impermissibly vague.
Facts
On April 29, 1992, widespread rioting, looting, arson, violence, and general civil disorder broke out in the County of Los Angeles. Military troops were called in to help quell the disturbance and restore order when it became apparent that local law enforcement agencies were overwhelmed by the extent of the problem. In response to this…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. AvinoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Cole v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1994
- COUNTY OF BUTLER v. THOMAS W. WOLFDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.