Cole v. City of Memphis
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CITY OF MEMPHIS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JON P. McCALLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant City of Memphis’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed October 27, 2014. (ECF No. 92.) Plaintiffs Cole and Edmond filed a Response on November 24, 2014. (ECF No. 97.) Defendant City of Memphis filed a Reply on December 8, 2014. (ECF No. 101.) For the reasons set for below, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Allegations
Plaintiff Lakendus Cole is a police officer employed with the City of Memphis Police…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cole v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015