People v. Richardson

*Supp. 13Opinion

ROBERSON, P. J.

This cause having been submitted for decision, and fully considered, judgment is ordered as follows:

The judgment is affirmed.

Appellant challenges his conviction for violating Los Angeles Administrative Code1 section 8.78 (violating a curfew order).2 At arraignment, appellant pled not guilty and demurred to the complaint, contending, inter alia, that section 8.78 was unconstitutionally vague because it invited arbitrary and erratic arrests. The trial court determined that the section was not constitutionally infirm and denied appellant’s motion. Appellant was…