Legal Opinion
Howard Hall Company v. United States
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided October 15, 1971No. Civ. A. 70-626PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
POINTER, Distinct Judge.
Cooper-Transfer Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Cooper) applied for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under Section 207 of the Interstate Commerce Act 1 to transport general commodities between Jacksonville, Florida and Thomasville, Georgia. The application 2 indicated that Cooper intended to “tack” the authority sought with its then existing routes to provide direct service between Jacksonville and other points served by Cooper in Alabama, Florida, Georgia and Louisiana. Eight carriers, including Howard Hall…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Allied Van Lines Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
- Howard Hall Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Transfer & Storage Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Twin City Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
- Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
- Subler Transfer, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
- Curtis, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc., Intervenor-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.