Curtis, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc., Intervenor-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner Curtis, Inc. and intervenor-pe-titioner Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. (petitioners) seek review of a decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) granting authority to National Carriers, Inc. (NCI) to transport frozen foodstuffs as a common carrier…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Midwestern Transportation, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Graves Truck Line, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
- Howard Hall Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Auto Driveaway Co., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- C.O.D.E., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- American Trucking Associations Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983