Legal Opinion

Howard Hall Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1942No. 210PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

This case, like United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., ante, p. 475, is an appeal from a district court of three judges (38 E. Supp. 556) convened to review an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (24 M. C. C. 273) granting appellant a certificate of public convenience and necessity as a common carrier by motor vehicle under the so-called “grandfather clause” (§ 206 (a)) of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935. 49 U. S. C. § 306.

Appellant made application as a common carrier of general commodities operating over irregular routes. It sought authority to operate between all points in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lang Transp. Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  2. Inland Motor Freight v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1945
  3. Hunter v. HusseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Cardinale Trucking Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
  5. Howard Hall Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API