Legal Opinion
State v. Redeman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 27, 1972No. C-71-04-1233PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction for receiving and concealing stolen property. Former ORS 165.045. His assignments of error are: (1) evidence seized pursuant to a valid search warrant should have been suppressed; (2) there was insufficient evidence that defendant knew or had good reason to believe the property was stolen; and (3) (a) ORS 165.045 is unconstitutional to the extent which it allows conviction based on a person’s “having good reason to believe” property he received or concealed is stolen; (b) a jury instruction based upon the statute was erroneous.
On or about March 4, 1971,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. BurrowOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- State v. MayoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.