Legal Opinion

Iowa Service Co. v. City of Villisca

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 5, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.

The plaintiff brings its action as a taxpayer. Its real interest in the litigation, however, is somewhat deeper. It owns and operates in the city of Villisca a distributing system for electric light and power. This system consists in the main of poles and wires. There is no power plant established in said city. At an election called for the purpose, the electors o-f the city voted to incur an indebtedness for the establishment of a light and power plant for the municipality, and voted to ibsue bonds therefor in the sum of $75,000. The plaintiff has sought, without success, to sell to the city…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washington-Oregon Corp. v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ledwith v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Town of ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Fitzgerald v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Commonwealth Public Service Co. v. City of Deer LodgeMontana Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API