Legal Opinion

Ledwith v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1923No. 22387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Lancaster county: William M. Morning, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Begley, Distinct Judge.

The city of Lincoln, having previously voted bonds to the'extent of $500,000 for the extension and improvement of the city water and light plants, caused a notice to contractors to be published calling for sealed bids to be *426received for the construction of a water and light plant at Thirtieth and A streets of an estimated cost of $150,000. The notice to contractors contained the following provision: “The city reserves the option to make payment in warrants or city of Lincoln bonds.” Sealed bids were received under said notice, all within the engineer’s estimated cost,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Washington-Oregon Corp. v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Otto v. School District No. 4Nebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 194Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Commonwealth Public Service Co. v. City of Deer LodgeMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Iowa Service Co. v. City of VilliscaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Competitive Bidding Requirements Under the Federal-Aid Highway Program, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2013
  5. Competitive Bidding Requirements Under the Federal-Aid Highway Program, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API