Legal Opinion
In re Daniel C.
New York City Family Court
Decided August 8, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Karen S. Burstein, J.
On July 15, 1991, this court granted, from the Bench, *731respondent’s oral motion to dismiss the instant proceeding for failure to conform with the requirements of Family Court Act § 350.1. The court found then, and reasserts in writing here, that the first adjournment of the dispositional hearing for 60 days and the second for 38 constituted unwaivable jurisdictional defects. The court believes its decision is compelled by the legislative architecture of Family Court Act article 3 for which the Court of Appeals, in a series of recent opinions, has…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Frank C.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re Randy K.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re Detrece H.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re David R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re Gregory C.New York City Family Court · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Jose Z.New York City Family Court · 1992
- In re Terrence T.New York City Family Court · 1992
- In re Nicole D.New York City Family Court · 1992