Legal Opinion
In re Jose Z.
New York City Family Court
Decided April 8, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judith B. Sheindlin, J.
The issue presented on respondent’s motion to dismiss is whether this court, having found respondent guilty of a crime, must dismiss the case on speedy disposition grounds, when the respondent was out on a warrant for 14 months.
The respondent was arrested for grand larceny on January 31, 1990. Upon his failure to appear at arraignment in March of 1990, a warrant was issued for his arrest. On October 29, *4511990 he was arrested for robbery and returned to court on the warrant.
Respondent pleaded guilty to unauthorized use of a vehicle (Penal Law §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re Frank C.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re Randy K.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re Vincent M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re David R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Christopher WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993