Legal Opinion
In re Randy K.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1991PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hancock, Jr., J.
Family Court Act § 340.1 (2) mandates that where, as here, a respondent is not in detention, a fact-finding hearing shall commence not more than 60 days after the conclusion of the initial appearance except as provided in subdivision (4) of the statute. Subdivision (4) permits a court to adjourn a fact-finding hearing on its own motion or on motion of the presentment agency for good cause shown for not more than 30 days. Subdivision (5) provides that the "court shall state on the record the reason for any adjournment of the fact-finding hearing” (Family Ct…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Frank C.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People Ex Rel. Guggenheim v. MucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- In re Jerome S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re Randy K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by89 opinions
- People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re Detrece H.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Matter of Jose R.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of Benjamin L.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re Aaron J.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.