Legal Opinion

State v. McGill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1985No. 8416SC441Published

1Opinion of the Court

326 S.E.2d 345 (1985)

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Kim Riley McGILL.

No. 8416SC441.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 5, 1985.

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. Charles J. Murray, Raleigh, for the State.

Robert D. Jacobson, Lumberton, for defendant.

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the denial of various motions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. He directs his attack to the issue of causation. We note first that the state produced ample evidence to support the jury's verdict on the DUI charge. State v. Scott, 71 N.C.App. 570, 322 S.E.2d 613 (1984).…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Atkins v. MoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. McKenzieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API